Главная / Main Page / "Knowledge. Understanding. Skill" Journal / Contents / 2010 / No. 2
Lamazhaa Ch. K. Archaization, Traditionalism and Neotraditionalism
(Moscow University for the Humanities)
Abstract ◊ The article analyses the most widespread interpretations of the concepts “archaization”, “traditionalism” and “neotraditionalism” that are being extensively used in social sciences for the characterization of contemporary social processes in Russia. The author denotes some methodological problems, states the essence of these concepts and specifies the general and the particular of each of them.
Keywords: archaization, traditionalism, neotraditionalism, social processes, society, culture, categories of culture, theory, practice
Lamazhaa Chimiza Kuder-oolovna, Candidate of Science (philosophy), senior researcher of the Institute of Fundamental and Applied Studies, Moscow University for the Humanities, full member of the International Academy of Science (Innsbruck). Tel.: (495) 374-59-30. E-mail:
lamajaa@mail.ru
Citation: Lamazhaa, Ch. K. (2010) Arkhaizatsiia, traditsionalizm i neotraditsionalizm [Archaization, Traditionalism and Neotraditionalism]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, no. 2, pp. 88–93. (In Russ.).
RUSSIAN VERSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY (TRANSLITERATION)
Akhiezer, A. S. (2001) Arkhaizatsiia v rossiiskom obshchestve kak metodologicheskaia problema // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. № 2. S. 89–100.
Achkasov, V. A. (2004) Transformatsiia traditsii i politicheskaia modernizatsiia: fenomen rossiiskogo traditsionalizma. Filosofiia i sotsial'no-politicheskie tsennosti konservatizma v obshchestvennom soznanii Rossii (ot istokov k sovremennosti) : sb. statei. Vyp. 1 / pod red. Iu. N. Solonina. SPb. : Izd-vo SPbGU. S. 173–191.
Gofman, A. B. (2008) Ot kakogo nasledstva my ne otkazyvaemsia? Sotsiokul'turnye traditsii i innovatsii v Rossii na rubezhe XX–XXI vekov // Traditsii i innovatsii v sovremennoi Rossii: sotsiologicheskii analiz vzaimodeistviia i dinamiki. M. S. 9–112.
Gudkov, L. D. (2002) Russkii neotraditsionalizm i soprotivlenie peremenam // Mul'tikul'turalizm i transformatsiia postsovetskikh obshchestv / pod red. V. S. Malakhova i V. A. Tishkova. M. : Institut etnologii i antropologii RAN ; Institut filosofii RAN. S. 124–147.
Gurevich, A. Ia. (1971) Kategorii srednevekovoi kul'tury. M.
Lamazhaa, Ch. K. (2009) Problema arkhaizatsii obshchestva // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. № 4. S. 44–48.
Madiukova, S. A. (2008) Sotsiokul'turnyi neotraditsionalizm v obriadakh zhiznennogo tsikla (na primere zhenshchin tiurkskikh etnosov Iuzhnoi Sibiri) : avtoref. dis. … kand. filos. nauk. Novosibirsk.
Mankheim, K. (1994) Diagnoz nashego vremeni. M. : Konservativnaia mysl'.
Pain, E. A. (2004a) Mezhdu imperiei i natsiei: modernistskii proekt i ego traditsionalistskaia al'ternativa v natsional'noi politike Rossii / 2-e izd., dop. M. : Novoe izdatel'stvo.
Pain, E. A. (2004b) Etnopoliticheskii maiatnik. Dinamika i mekhanizmy etnopoliticheskikh protsessov v postsovetskoi Rossii. M. : Institut sotsiologii RAN.
Pika, A. I. (1996) Neotraditsionalizm na rossiiskom Severe: idti v budushchee, ne zabyvaia proshlogo // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia. № 11. S. 47–53.
Riude, Dzh. (1984) Narodnye nizy v istorii, 1730–1848 / per. s angl. E. I. Bukharovoi, A. O. Zeleninoi. M. : Progress.
Stepin, V. S. (1996) Epokha peremen i stsenarii budushchego. M.
Shatskii, E. (1990) Utopiia i traditsiia. M.
|
|
|
|
Вышел в свет
№4 журнала за 2021 г.
|
|
|