Журнал индексируется:

Российский индекс научного цитирования

Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory

CrossRef

СiteFactor

Научная электронная библиотека «Киберленинка»

Портал
(электронная версия)
индексируется:

Российский индекс научного цитирования

Информация о журнале:

Знание. Понимание. Умение - статья из Википедии

Система Orphus


Инновационные образовательные технологии в России и за рубежом


Московский гуманитарный университет



Электронный журнал "Новые исследования Тувы"



Научно-исследовательская база данных "Российские модели архаизации и неотрадиционализма"




Знание. Понимание. Умение
Главная / Main Page / "Knowledge. Understanding. Skill" Journal / Contents / 2014 / No. 3

Flier A. Ya. Understanding History in Cultural Context

(Likhachev Russian Research Institute for Cultural and Natural Heritage)

Abstract ♦ The article analyzes the specific role of culture in social evolution, which is expressed in perception of historical time.

A vague idea of the past, sacralization of the present, and almost complete absence of ideas of the future were typical for the Primitive stage of social evolution. Sacralization of the past, a tolerant attitude towards the present and an eschatological vision of the future as a post-mortem human condition characterized the Agrarian stage. A complete inversion in the perception of time, as compared with the Agrarian era, took place at the Industrial stage. Then, vice versa, the past was rejected as a failed experience, whereas the present was seen as the stage of social transformation, and the future was regarded as an ideal state of society which should be consciously and meticulously constructed. The rejection of both extremes — denial of the past and enthusiastic expectation of the future — is characteristic for the Post-industrial stage of social evolution. The contemporary perception of time is characterized by an increased focus on the present as the only social reality that is presentative to us.

The article deals with interpretations of such dynamics of perception of time from the standpoint of civilizationism, evolutionism, and synergetic theory. The author supports the synergetic interpretation and hypothesizes that the history of culture in its traditional forms and functions is close to its end. The next step is to transform the whole system of regulating social life from tradition to more rational forms determined by human mind.

Keywords: theory of culture, philosophy of history, historiosophy, understanding of the past, understanding of the present, understanding of the future, meaning of history, meaning of culture, understanding of time, synergetics.


Flier Andrei Yakovlevich, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Chief Researcher, Experimental and Analytical Center for the Development of Educational Systems in Cultural Sphere, D. S. Likhachev Russian Research Institute for Cultural and Natural Heritage. Postal address: 2 Kosmonavtov St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 129366. Tel.: +7 (495) 686-13-19. E-mail: andrey.flier@yandex.ru

Download

Citation: Flier, A. Ya. (2014) [Understanding History in Cultural Context]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, no. 3, pp. 58–67. (In Russ.).

Submission date: 12.05.2014.

RUSSIAN VERSION


REFERENCE

Berlin, I. (2001) Dve kontseptsii svobody [Two Concepts of Liberty]. In: Berlin I. Filosofiia svobody. Evropa [Philosophy of Freedom. Europe]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie . 448 р. Pp. 135–231. (In Russ.).

D’yakonov, I. M. (1994) Puti istorii. Ot drevneishego cheloveka do nashikh dnei [Paths of History. From Early Man to Present Day]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., Vostochnaia literatura. 384 р. (In Russ.).

Kostina, A. V. and Flier A. Ya. (2009) Tri tipa kul'tury — tri funktsional'nye strategii zhiznedeiatel'nosti [Three Types of Culture — Three Functional Strategies of Life Activity]. Vestnik Cheliabinskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii kul'tury i iskusstv, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 23–36. (In Russ.).

Lamazhaa, Ch. K. (2013) Arkhaizatsiia obshchestva. Tuvinskii fenomen [The Archaization of Society. The Tuvan Phenomenon]. Moscow, Librokom Publ. House. 272 p. (In Russ.).

Le Goff, J. (2002) Drugoe srednevekov'e. Vremia, trud i kul'tura Zapada [The Other Middle Ages. Time, Work and Culture in the Middle Ages]. Ekaterinburg, Ural University Press. 328 p. (In Russ.).

Le Goff, J. (2011) Geroi i chudesa Srednikh vekov [Heroes and Wonders of the Middle Ages]. Moscow, Tekst Publ. 220 [4] p. (In Russ.).

McLuhan, M. (2003) Ponimanie media: vneshnie rasshireniia cheloveka [Understanding Media: The Extension of Man]. Moscow, Kanon-Press-Ts Publ ; Kuchkovo pole Publ. 464 p. (In Russ.).

Malinowski, B. (2004) Dinamika kul'turnykh izmenenii: Issledovanie rasovykh otnoshenii v Afrike [The Dynamics of Culture Change: An Inquiry into Race Relations in Africa]. In: Malinowski B. Izbrannoe: Dinamika kul'tury [Selected Works. Dynamics of Culture]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ. 959 р. Pp. 7–210. (In Russ.).

Nazaretyan, A. P. (2004) Tsivilizatsionnye krizisy v kontekste Universalnoy istorii (Sinergetica — psikhologiia — prognozirovanie) [Civilization Crises in the Context of Universal History (Synergetics — Psychology — Forecasting)]. Moscow, Mir Publ. 368 р. (In Russ.).

Pelipenko, A. A. (2007) Dualisticheskaia revoliutsiia i smyslogenez v istorii [Dualistic Revolution and Semiogenesis in History]. Moscow, Moscow State University of Culture and Arts Press. 434 р. (In Russ.).

Flier, A. Ya. (2011) Vektor kul'turnoi evoliutsii [Vector of Cultural Evolution]. Observatoriia kul'tury, no. 5, pp. 4–16. (In Russ.).

Flier, A. Ya. (2013) Kul'turnaia sreda i ee sotsial'nye cherty [Cultural Milieu and Its Social Traits]. Informatsionnyi gumanitarnyi portal «Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie», no. 2 (March — April) [online] Available at: http://www.zpu-journal.ru/e-zpu/2013/2/Flier_Cultural-Milieu/ [archived in WebCite] (accessed 12.02.2014). (In Russ.).

Flier, A. Ya. (2014) Ocherki teorii istoricheskoi dinamiki kul'tury [Essays on the Theory of the Historical Dynamics of Culture]. In: Flier A. Ya. Izbrannye raboty po teorii kul'tury [Selected Works on the Theory of Culture]. Moscow, Soglasie Publ.; Artem Publ. 560 p. Pp. 17–300. (In Russ.).

Habermas, J. (2003) Filosofskii diskurs o moderne [The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity]. Moscow, Ves' mir Publ. 416 p. (In Russ.).

Khachaturian, V. M. (2009) «Vtoraia zhizn'» arkhaiki: arkhaizuiushchie tendentsii v tsivilizatsionnom protsesse [“Second Life” of Archaic: Archaic Trends in Civilizational Process]. Moscow, Academia Publ. 290 [1] р. (In Russ.).

Shilder, N. K. (1897) Imperator Aleksandr I. Ego zhizn’ i tsarstvovanie [Emperor Alexander I. His Life and Reign] : in 4 vols. St. Petersburg, A. S. Suvorin Publ. Vol. 2. 408 р. (In Russ.).

Shtompel, O. M. and Shtompel, L. A. (2010) Arkhaizatsiia sovremennoi kul'tury: neobkhodimost' ili sluchainost'? [Archaization in Contemporary Culture: Necessity or Chance?]. Tsennosti i smysly, no. 4, pp. 35–43. (In Russ.).

Eliade, M. (1998) Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii: arkhetipy i povtoriaemost' [The Myth of the Eternal Return: Archetypes and Repetition]. St. Petersburg, Aleteiia Publ. 249 p. (In Russ.).

Bell, D. (1973) The Coming of Post-industrial Society: A Venture of Social Forecasting. New York, Basic Books. xiii, 507 р.

Brzeziński, Z. K. (1970) Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era. New York, Viking Press. 123 р.

Christian, D. (2004) Maps of Time: An Introduction to Big History. Berkeley, University of California Press. xxii, 642 р.

Fourastie, J. (1974) Prévision, futurologie, prospective: Cours de l'Institut d'Études Politiques de Paris. Paris, Les Cours de droit. 113 р. (In Fr.).

McLuhan, M. and Fiore, Q. (1968) War and Peace in the Global Village. New York, Bantam Books. 190 р.

Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1952) Structure and Function in Primitive Society. Glencoe, IL, The Free Press. 304 р.

Sklair, L. (1970) The Sociology of Progress. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul. xvi, 272 р.

Spier, F. (2005) How Big History Works: Energy Flows and the Rise and Demise of Complexity. Social Evolution & History, vol. 4, no. 1, pр. 87–135.

Touraine, A. (1969) La Societé post-industrielle. Naissance d’une société. Paris, Denoël ; Gonthier. 315 р. (In Fr.).



в начало документа
  Забыли свой пароль?
  Регистрация





  "Знание. Понимание. Умение" № 4 2021
Вышел  в свет
№4 журнала за 2021 г.



Каким станет высшее образование в конце XXI века?
 глобальным и единым для всего мира
 локальным с возрождением традиций национальных образовательных моделей
 каким-то еще
 необходимость в нем отпадет вообще
проголосовать
Московский гуманитарный университет © Редакция Информационного гуманитарного портала «Знание. Понимание. Умение»
Портал зарегистрирован Федеральной службой по надзору за соблюдением законодательства в сфере
СМИ и охраны культурного наследия. Свидетельство о регистрации Эл № ФС77-25026 от 14 июля 2006 г.

Портал зарегистрирован НТЦ «Информрегистр» в Государственном регистре как база данных за № 0220812773.

При использовании материалов индексируемая гиперссылка на портал обязательна.

Яндекс цитирования  Rambler's Top100


Разработка web-сайта: «Интернет Фабрика»