Журнал индексируется:

Российский индекс научного цитирования

Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory

CrossRef

СiteFactor

Научная электронная библиотека «Киберленинка»

Портал
(электронная версия)
индексируется:

Российский индекс научного цитирования

Информация о журнале:

Знание. Понимание. Умение - статья из Википедии

Система Orphus


Инновационные образовательные технологии в России и за рубежом


Московский гуманитарный университет



Электронный журнал "Новые исследования Тувы"



Научно-исследовательская база данных "Российские модели архаизации и неотрадиционализма"




Знание. Понимание. Умение
Главная / Main Page / "Knowledge. Understanding. Skill" Journal / Contents / 2014 / No. 2

Zakharov N. V. Shakespearianism in Pushkin's Creative Works

(Moscow University for the Humanities)

Abstract ♦ The present article is concerned with the problem of Pushkin’s creative evolution under the influence of Shakespeare’s creative works. The research delineates the terms of Pushkin’s Shakespearism, providing a detailed analysis of Pushkin’s texts and its degree of dependence on Shakespeare. Pushkin remains the most outstanding representative of Russian Shakespearianism. Following the Decembrists, Pushkin set himself a goal, to create a national literature in Russia, and in this he had better success than anyone else. The poet’s Shakespearianism did not appear just due to the literary fashion, widely spread in Western Europe. It was different from the cult of Shakespeare, as well as from Shakespearisation, so evident in the work of his many contemporaries. Pushkin’s interest for Shakespeare the writer developed into a stronger spiritual relationship. Pushkin’s Shakespearianism incorporates a complete world outlook, and from a mere literary influence it became a philosophic stand. Mature Pushkin’s concept of authority and the people was shaped by Shakespeare’s work. Pushkin called Shakespeare a Romantic, meaning that true Romanticism creates art that is fitted to the time spirit and linked to national life. Pushkin tried to adapt Shakespeare’s artistic method to the contemporary state of society. He considered objectivity, truthfulness of characters and “a precise reflection of the period” to be the main features of Shakespearian manner of writing. “In the manner of our Father Shakespeare” Pushkin created his tragedy Boris Godunov (1825) and adopted Shakespeare’s objectivity while depicting the time and characters. Foregrounding the issues of authority status and its interaction with the people, Pushkin followed Shakespeare, and results of this imitation are evident in his narrative poem Angelo (1833), which paraphrases the play of Measure for Measure.

Keywords: Shakespeare, Shakespearianism, comparative research, creative evolution, adaptation, translation.


Zakharov Nikolay Vladimirovich, Candidate of Philology, PhD, Aide to the Rector; Director, Center for Theory and History of Culture, Institute of Fundamental and Applied Studies, Moscow University for the Humanities; Full member, International Academy of Sciences; Academic Secretary, Shakespeare Committee, Russian Academy of Sciences. Postal address: Bldg. 6, 5 Yunosti St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 111395. Tel. +7 (499) 374-75-95. E-mail: nikoltine@yandex.ru

Download

Citation: Zakharov, N. V. (2014) Shekspirizm v tvorchestve A. S. Pushkina [Shakespearianism in Pushkin’s Creative Works]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, no. 2, pp. 235–249. (In Russ.).

Submission date: 12.03.2014.

RUSSIAN VERSION


REFERENCES

A. S. Pushkin v vospominaniiakh sovremennikov [A.S. Pushkin in the memoirs of his contemporaries] (1998) : in 2 vol. St. Petersburg, Akademicheskii proekt. Vol. 2. 656 p. (In Russ.).

Annenkov, P. V. (1874) Aleksandr Sergeevich Pushkin v Aleksandrovskuiu epokhu, 1799–1826 gg. VIII. Shekspirizm [Aleksandr Sergeevich Pushkin in the Age of Alexander I, 1799-1826. VIII. Shakespearianism]. Vestnik Evropy, vol. 2. St. Petersburg. (In Russ.).

Vannovsky, A. A. (1999) Novye dannye o vliianii Shekspira na Pushkina: (Zagadka mesti za dushu) [New data on Shakespeare’s influence over Pushkin]. In: Pushkinist, vol. 1 / comp. by G. G. Krasukhin. Moscow, Sovremennik. 416 p. Pp. 308–402. (In Russ.).

Gaydin, B. N. (2009) Vechnye obrazy kak konstanty kul’tury (interpretatsiia «gamletovskogo voprosa») [Eternal Images as Constants of Culture (An Interpretation of “Hamlet’s Question”] : diss. … Candidate of Philosophy. Moscow. 194 p. (In Russ.).

Gorbunov, A. N. (2006) Shekspirovskie konteksty [Shakespeare’s Contexts]. Moscow, MediaMir Publ. 364 p. (In Russ.).

Zakharov, N. V. (2003) Shekspir v tvorcheskoi evoliutsii Pushkina [Shakespeare in the Creative Evolution of Pushkin]. Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä University Printing House. 283 p. (In Russ.).

Zakharov, N. V. (2008) Shekspirizm russkoi klassicheskoi literatury: tezaurusnyi analiz [The Shakespearianism of Russian Classical Literature: The Thesaurus Analysis] / ed. by Vl. A. Lukov. Moscow, Moscow University for the Humanities Publ. 320 p. (In Russ.).

Lotman, Yu. M. (1995) Pushkin. Biografiia pisatelia. Stat’i i zametki 1960–1990. «Evgenii Onegin». Kommentarii [Pushkin. A Biography of a writer. Essays and articles 1960-1990. “Eugene Onegin”: a commentary]. St. Petersburg, Iskusstvo-SPB Publ. 847 p. (In Russ.).

Lukov, Val. A., Zakharov, N. V. and Lukov, Vl. A. (2012) Shekspirosfera [The Shakespearean Sphere] In: Zakharov, N. V. and Lukov, Vl. A. Genii na veka: Shekspir v evropeiskoi kul’ture [A Genius for All Time: Shakespeare in European Culture]. Moscow, Humanities Institute of TV & Radio Broadcasting  Publ. 504 p. Pp. 324–336. (In Russ.).

Lukov, Val. A. and Lukov, Vl. A. (2013) Tezaurusy II: Tezaurusnyi podkhod k ponimaniiu cheloveka i ego mira [Thesauri II: The Thesaurus Approach to the Conceptualization of the Person and His/Her World]. Moscow, The National Institute of Business Publ. 640 p. (In Russ.).

Mikeladze, N. E. (2005) Shekspir i Makiavelli: tema «makiavellizma» v shekspirovskoi drame [Shakespeare and Machiavelli: The Theme of Machiavellism in Shakespearean Drama]. Moscow, VK Publ. 492 p. (In Russ.).

Morozov, M. M. (1979) Izbrannoe [Selected Works]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ. 669 p. (In Russ.).

Pervushina, E. A. (2010) Sonety Shekspira v Rossii: perevodcheskaia retseptsiia XIX–XXI vv. [Shakespeare’s Sonnets in Russia: The Translation Reception of the 19th–21st Centuries] Vladivostok, Far Eastern University Publ. 354 p. (In Russ.).

Pushkin, A. S. (1937) Polnoe sobranie sochinenii [Complete Works : in 16 vol. Moscow, Leningrad, Publ. House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Vol. VI. Evgenii Onegin [Eugene Onegin]. (In Russ.).

Ronen, I. (1997) Smyslovoi stroi tragedii Pushkina «Boris Godunov» [The Structure of Meaning in Pushkin’s Tragedy ”Boris Godunov”]. Moscow, ITs-Grant Publ. 160 p. (In Russ.).

Smirnov, A. A. (1963) Shekspir [Shakespeare]. Leningrad ; Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ. 192 p. (In Russ.).

Bate, J. (2009) Soul of the Age: A Biography of the Mind of William Shakespeare. New York, Random House. xix, 471 р.

Briggs, A. D. P. (1983) Alexander Pushkin. A Critical Study. London ; Canberra, Croom Helm ; Totowa, NJ, Barnes & Noble Books.

Greenblatt, S. (2004) Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare. New York, W. W. Norton. 430 р.

Greenleaf, M. (1994) Pushkin and Romantic Fashion. Fragment, Elegy, Orient, Irony. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press.

Honan, P. (1999) Shakespeare: A Life. Oxford, Oxford University Press. xvi, 479 p.

Shakespeare on Film (1998) / ed. by R. Shaughnessy. Basingstoke ; New York, Palgrave. xi, 206 p.

Shapiro, J. (2005) 1599: A Year in the Life of William Shakespeare. London, Faber and Faber. xxiv, 429 p.

Shaw, J. T. (1994) Pushkin’s Poetics of the Unexpected: The Nonrhymed Lines in the Rhymed Poetry and the Rhymed Lines in the Nonrhymed Poetry. Columbus, OH, Slavica Publishers, Inc.

The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Popular Culture (2007) / ed. by R. Shaughnessy. Cambridge ; New York, Cambridge University Press. ix, 291 p.



в начало документа
  Забыли свой пароль?
  Регистрация





  "Знание. Понимание. Умение" № 4 2021
Вышел  в свет
№4 журнала за 2021 г.



Каким станет высшее образование в конце XXI века?
 глобальным и единым для всего мира
 локальным с возрождением традиций национальных образовательных моделей
 каким-то еще
 необходимость в нем отпадет вообще
проголосовать
Московский гуманитарный университет © Редакция Информационного гуманитарного портала «Знание. Понимание. Умение»
Портал зарегистрирован Федеральной службой по надзору за соблюдением законодательства в сфере
СМИ и охраны культурного наследия. Свидетельство о регистрации Эл № ФС77-25026 от 14 июля 2006 г.

Портал зарегистрирован НТЦ «Информрегистр» в Государственном регистре как база данных за № 0220812773.

При использовании материалов индексируемая гиперссылка на портал обязательна.

Яндекс цитирования  Rambler's Top100


Разработка web-сайта: «Интернет Фабрика»