Главная / Main Page / "Knowledge. Understanding. Skill" Journal / Contents / 2012 / No. 1
Erokhina L. A. The Problem of Interpretation and the Category of the Author in Umberto Eco’s Aesthetics
(Moscow Pedagogical State University)
Abstract ◊ The article describes the connection between Umberto Eco's aesthetic views and his conceptualization of the author — the key figure of interpretation.
Keywords: interpretation, communication, aesthetic function.
Erokhina Liubov Alekseevna, postgraduate of the Worldwide Literature Department at Moscow Pedagogical State University. Tel.: +7 (495) 246-57-12. E-mail:
erokhina.liubov@ya.ru. Research adviser — Doctor of Science (philology), professor V. P. Trykov.
Citation: Erokhina L. A. Problema interpretatsii i kategoriia avtora v estetike Umberto Eko // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2012. № 1. S. 274–277.
RUSSIAN VERSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY (TRANSLITERATION)
Gritsanov, A. A., Mozheiko, M. A. (2001) Postmodernizm. Entsiklopediia. Minsk : Interpresservis ; Knizhnyi Dom.
Reingol'd, S. (1994) «Otravit' monakha», ili chelovecheskie tsennosti po Umberto Eko // Inostrannaia literatura. № 4. S. 269–274.
Usmanova, A. R. (2000a) Umberto Eko: Paradoksy interpretatsii : dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Minsk.
Usmanova, A. R. (2000b) Umberto Eko: Paradoksy interpretatsii. Minsk : Propilei.
Eko, U. (2004a) Otkrytoe proizvedenie : Forma i neopredelennost' v sovremennoi poetike SPb. : Akademicheskii proekt.
Eko, U. (2004b) Otsutstvuiushchaia struktura : Vvedenie v semiologiiu. SPb. : Symposium.
Eko, U. (2005) Rol' chitatelia : Issledovaniia po semiotike teksta. SPb. : Symposium.
Eco, U. (1990) Unlimited Semiosis and Drift: Pragmaticism vs. "Pragmatism" // The Limits of Interpretation (Advances in Semiotics). Bloomington ; Indianapolis : Indiana University Press. P. 22–43.
Eco, U. (1992) Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
Peirce, Ch. S. (1955) Logic as Semiotic: The Theory of Signs // Philosophical Writings of Peirce / ed. by J. Buchler. N. Y. : Dover Publications. P. 98–119.
|